Investor's Corner
Wall Street’s reaction to Tesla’s proposed buyout of SolarCity
Since the proposed deal of Tesla to acquire SolarCity in a stock exchange with no cash involved was announced, a flurry of reports flooded the Internet, pretty much with many Wall Street reporters and pundits decrying the proposed deal as “crazy”, “not a no-brainer”, an “eclipse”, “plot of video game”, “sounds nuts”, but also with a few noting that Elon was “creating a clean energy empire” or “offering a one-stop shop.”
At the same time, the after-market reaction was swift: TSLA stock plunged 12% and SCTY stock rose 18%. This action was predictable. Since the Tesla – SolarCity deal is an exchange of stock, no cash deal, when adding about 12 million new shares, an 8% dilution of TSLA stock will occur. This dilution covers the majority of TSLA stock drop. Another negative factor is going from $2 billion of TSLA cash flow losses to $4.8 billion of cash flow losses of the combined companies, an increase of over 130%. Thirdly, TSLA debt will double after the deal. So a 12% drop should not leave anyone surprised.
Similarly, the assured “premium of approximately 21% to 30% over the closing price of SolarCity’s shares,” as stated in the letter to Lyndon Rive, pretty much matches the 29 percent rise of SCTY in extended trading, also matching SolarCity’s average 12-month price target of $29.82 among analysts surveyed by Bloomberg. So the stock action of both TSLA and SCTY was completely predictable.
Looking at the reporters / pundits comments, Bloomberg was the outlet with the most reports, 4 in all.
Tom Randell of Bloomberg reported in “Musk Buys Musk: Tesla’s SolarCity Deal by the Numbers”, that “ either Musk is bailing out a beleaguered company that’s run by his cousin, Lyndon Rive, or he’s consolidating a clean-energy empire at rock-bottom prices. Or both.”
Tom is one of the most bullish on the deal, saying that “It allows Musk to integrate the three-legged stool of clean energy in a way the world has never seen: electric cars, solar power, and grid battery storage all in one place. If so inclined, you could provide for all of your energy needs without ever leaving the Tesla family.”
Chris Martin of Bloomberg reported in “In SolarCity Bid, Tesla’s Musk Targets Customer Who Wants It All” that “Tesla Motors Inc.’s offer to buy SolarCity Corp. would combine two already deeply linked companies to offer clean energy enthusiasts a one-stop shop” and that “the challenge I see around this for both companies is that they’re kind of strapped for cash,” quoting Hugh Bromley, an analyst for Bloomberg New Energy Finance in New York. “They both need cash injections to fuel their growth.”
Dana Hull of Bloomberg reported in “Tesla Takeover of SolarCity Not a ‘No-Brainer’ for Investors” that “Oppenheimer & Co. analysts including Colin Rusch downgraded Tesla to perform from outperform in a research note published late Tuesday, saying they expect “a robust shareholder fight over this acquisition centered on corporate governance” and that “Credit Suisse Group AG analysts including Patrick Jobin said in a separate note that they expect “resistance from Tesla shareholders” and warned of “many corporate governance challenges.”
Lastly Liam Denning of Bloomberg reported in “Tesla’s SolarCity Eclipse” that “the timing is odd, to say the least. Tesla’s all-stock offer is pitched as providing SolarCity’s investors with a premium of 21 to 30 percent, based on a proposed valuation band that’s subject to completing due diligence (itself an unusual proposal)” and “Tesla is jumping in as SolarCity’s entire business model is being openly questioned amid rapid cash burn and stubbornly high overheads.”
Ominously he also reported that “Tuesday evening, not long after news of the offer broke, Tesla’s valuation had dropped by $3.8 billion in after-hours trading — 1.8 times the entire market capitalization of SolarCity before the announcement. Awkward, much?”
Ary Levi of CNBC reported in “Elon buying Elon: Sounds a lot like the plot of a video game” that this was “potential deal in which one of the country’s best-known tech billionaires will effectively transfer cash from one of his pockets to another – sounds nuts.” and joked about that “even if we all exist in a simulation, as Musk suggested at the Code Conference this month, he still has to obey securities laws.”
Christine Wang of CNBC reported in “Bid for SolarCity may mean Elon Musk doesn’t see Tesla as an auto company” quoting trader Karen Finerman saying that “Tesla’s offer, valued up to $28.50 per share, doesn’t seem like a gigantic price for a company that was trading significantly higher not that long ago.”
Charley Grant and Spencer Jakab of The Wall Street Journal reported in “Tesla Buying SolarCity: This Deal Defies Common Sense” that “just a day after Tesla boss Elon Musk made the odd boast that one of its cars “floats well enough to turn into a boat,” he did something even odder. Tesla’s bid for solar panel installation firm SolarCity on Tuesday afternoon is the sort of move that, even for the most Panglossian Silicon Valley investor, stretches the bounds of industrial logic” and that “as Mr. Musk warned about his amphibious wonder car, such harebrained schemes can only float “for short periods of time.”
Mike Ramsey, Lynn Cook and Mike Spector of The Wall Street Journal reported in “Tesla Offers to Acquire SolarCity”, quoting Elon saying that “the acquisition aims to create a company employing nearly 30,000 people with all products renamed “Tesla” that will package electric cars, batteries and solar panels for customers.” They also warned that “it would also add to the growing complexity and vertical integration of Tesla and add an unprofitable operation to its already-strained finances.”
Nichola Groom and Paul Lienert of Reuters reported in “Tesla offers $2.8 billion for SolarCity in ‘no brainer’ deal for Musk”, quoting Elon saying that that “instead of making three trips to a house to put in a car charger and solar panels and battery pack, you can integrate that into a single visit. It’s an obvious thing to do.” But they noticed that “Tesla investors punished the company’s shares, however.”
Investor's Corner
Tesla is ‘better-positioned’ as a company and as a stock as tariff situation escalates
Tesla is “better-positioned” as a company and as a stock as the tariff situation between the United States, Mexico, and Canada continues to escalate as President Donald Trump announced sanctions against those countries.
Analysts at Piper Sandler are unconcerned regarding Tesla’s position as a high-level stock holding as the tariff drama continues to unfold. This is mostly due to its reputation as a vehicle manufacturer in the domestic market, especially as it holds a distinct advantage of having some of the most American-made vehicles in the country.
Analysts at the firm, led by Alexander Potter, said Tesla is “one of the most defensive stocks” in the automotive sector as the tariff situation continues.
The defensive play comes from the nature of the stock, which should not be too impacted from a U.S. standpoint because of its focus on building vehicles and sourcing parts from manufacturers and companies based in the United States. Tesla has held the distinct title of having several of the most American-made cars, based on annual studies from Cars.com.
Its most recent study, released in June 2024, showed that the Model Y, Model S, and Model X are three of the top ten vehicles with the most U.S.-based manufacturing.
Tesla captures three spots in Cars.com’s American-Made Index, only U.S. manufacturer in list
The year prior, Tesla swept the top four spots of the study.
Piper Sandler analysts highlighted this point in a new note on Monday morning amidst increasing tension between the U.S. and Canada, as Mexico has already started to work with the Trump Administration on a solution:
“Tesla assembles five vehicles in the U.S., and all five rank among the most American-made cars.”
However, with that being said, there is certainly the potential for things to get tougher. The analysts believe that Tesla, while potentially impacted, will be in a better position than most companies because of their domestic position:
“If nothing changes in the next few days, tariffs will almost certainly deal a crippling blow to automotive supply chains in North America. [There is a possibility that] Trump capitulates in some way (perhaps he’ll delay implementation, in an effort to save face).”
There is no evidence that Tesla will be completely bulletproof when it comes to these potential impacts. However, it is definitely better insulated than other companies.
Need accessories for your Tesla? Check out the Teslarati Marketplace:
- https://shop.teslarati.com/collections/tesla-cybertruck-accessories
- https://shop.teslarati.com/collections/tesla-model-y-accessories
- https://shop.teslarati.com/collections/tesla-model-3-accessories
Please email me with questions and comments at joey@teslarati.com. I’d love to chat! You can also reach me on Twitter @KlenderJoey, or if you have news tips, you can email us at tips@teslarati.com.
Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) received a price target boost from analysts at Truist Securities, but it came with some criticisms based on a lack of information on several things that investors were excited to hear about regarding future vehicles and AI achievements.
Last night, Tesla reported its earnings from the fourth quarter of 2024, and while it had a very tempered financial showing, missing most of the Wall Street targets that were set for it, the stock was up after hours and on Thursday due to the details the company released regarding its plans for 2025.
CEO Elon Musk stunned listeners last night by revealing plans to launch unsupervised Full Self-Driving as a service in Austin in June 2025. It will be the first time Tesla will offer driverless FSD rides in public, something it has been working with the City of Austin on since December.
Tesla to launch unsupervised Full Self-Driving as a service in Austin in June
It also reiterated plans for affordable models to be launched this year, potentially catalyzing annual growth in deliveries, something it said it expects to resume in 2025.
Tesla was flat on deliveries in 2024 compared to 2023.
The positives during the call were enough for Truist Securities analyst William Stein to raise the company’s price target to $373 from $351. However, Stein’s note to investors showed there was something to be desired despite all the good that was revealed during the call:
Stein said there was “not enough ground-truth” during the call and too much of a focus on “cheerleading” the company’s potential releases this year:
“Too much cheerleading; not enough ground-truth. In Q4, TSLA’s ASP weakness drive revenue, GPM, OPM, & EPS below consensus.”
As previously mentioned, Tesla did report weak financials that missed consensus estimates. What saved the call and perhaps the stock from plummeting on these missed metrics was the other details that Musk revealed, especially the FSD launch in Austin in June.
There were also plenty of things related to the affordable models and other vehicles, like the fact that Tesla plans to include things like Steer by Wire, Adaptive Air Suspension, and Rear Wheel Steering, that helped offset negatives.
Stein saw this as a distraction from what should have been reported:
“While CEO Elon Musk played the role of cheerleader, calling for TSLA’s path to massive market cap by leading in autonomy, management was remarkably short on two critical details: (1) info about new vehicles in 2025 and (2) milestones for AI acheivements, especially FSD. We continue to ask ourselves ‘where’s the beef?’ CY26 EPS to $3.99 (from $4.87). DCF-derived PT to $373 (from $351).”
Tesla did detail some AI milestones, like its record-breaking miles per accident on Autopilot, which was a Q4-best of 5.94 million miles. The Shareholder Deck also outlined major upgrades to AI:
“In Q4, we completed the deployment of Cortex, a ~50k H100 training cluster at Gigafactory Texas. Cortex helped enable V13 of FSD (Supervised)1, which boasts major improvements in safety and comfort thanks to 4.2x increase in data, higher resolution video inputs, 2x reduction in photon-to-control latency and redesigned controller, among other enhancements.”
Tesla shares are up 2.11 percent on Thursday as of 12:05 p.m. on the East Coast.
Need accessories for your Tesla? Check out the Teslarati Marketplace:
- https://shop.teslarati.com/collections/tesla-cybertruck-accessories
- https://shop.teslarati.com/collections/tesla-model-y-accessories
- https://shop.teslarati.com/collections/tesla-model-3-accessories
Please email me with questions and comments at joey@teslarati.com. I’d love to chat! You can also reach me on Twitter @KlenderJoey, or if you have news tips, you can email us at tips@teslarati.com.
Tesla has released its Q4 2024 vehicle safety report. Similar to data from previous quarters, vehicles that were operating with Autopilot technology proved notably safer.
The Q4 2024 report:
- As per Tesla, it recorded one crash for every 5.94 million miles driven in which drivers were using Autopilot technology.
- The company also recorded one crash for every 1.08 million miles driven for drivers who were not using Autopilot technology.
- For comparison, the most recent data available from the NHTSA and FHWA (from 2023) showed that there was one automobile crash every 702,000 miles in the United States.
Previous safety reports:
- In Q3 2024, Tesla recorded one crash for every 7.08 million miles driven in which drivers were using Autopilot technology and one crash for every 1.29 million miles driven by drivers not using Autopilot technology.
- In Q2 2024, Tesla recorded one crash for every 6.88 million miles driven in which drivers were using Autopilot technology, and one crash for every 1.45 million miles driven for drivers not using Autopilot technology.
- In Q1 2024, Tesla recorded one crash for every 7.63 million miles driven in which drivers were using Autopilot technology, and one crash for every 955,000 million miles driven for drivers not using Autopilot technology.
Year-over-Year Comparison:
- In Q4 2023, Tesla recorded one crash for every 5.39 million miles driven in which drivers were using Autopilot technology and one crash for every 1.00 million miles driven for drivers not using Autopilot technology.
Key background:
- Tesla began voluntarily releasing quarterly safety reports in October 2018 to provide critical safety information about our vehicles to the public.
- On July 2019, Tesla started voluntarily releasing annual updated data about vehicle fires as well.
- It should be noted that accident rates among all vehicles on the road can vary from quarter to quarter and can be affected by seasonality, such as reduced daylight and inclement weather conditions.
Don’t hesitate to contact us with news tips. Just send a message to simon@teslarati.com to give us a heads up.
Armored Tesla Cybertruck “War Machine” debuts at Defense Expo 2025
Tesla Megapacks chosen for 548 MWh energy storage project in Japan
